123,123,123

內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介

　　來(lái)自英美法系的對(duì)抗制理念在我國(guó)風(fēng)靡一時(shí)。關(guān)于何謂“正當(dāng)程序”，一些對(duì)抗制教條逐漸演化為流行敘事，然而其理論預(yù)言卻時(shí)常與我國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐結(jié)果相悖。為了理清上述悖論，本書就相關(guān)機(jī)制進(jìn)行功能比較研究，并以之為樣本檢視上述教條在中國(guó)是否成立。為了跳出對(duì)抗制的論證循環(huán)，本書采檢察視角，以各國(guó)檢察官的程序角色和功能作為考查其刑事程序基本宗旨的最主要切面，并從比較法律文化和法律史的角度尋根溯源，發(fā)現(xiàn)流行的對(duì)抗制教條不但在中國(guó)難以成立，即便在其發(fā)源地也缺乏足夠的理論基礎(chǔ)。由此推論：我們應(yīng)將刑事訴訟程序定義為對(duì)真相的官方調(diào)查程序，而不是平等的非中立律師之間的私人爭(zhēng)端；因此應(yīng)強(qiáng)調(diào)檢察官的中立性和主導(dǎo)作用，以及刑事訴訟程序的內(nèi)部透明性。

作者簡(jiǎn)介

　　張帥 1984年生于山東青島。中國(guó)政法大學(xué)法學(xué)學(xué)士，碩士，荷蘭烏特勒支大學(xué)法學(xué)博士。2012 年受國(guó)家留學(xué)基金資助赴荷蘭深造，從事比較刑訴法研究。師從國(guó)際刑法協(xié)會(huì)主席John. Vervaele 教授、歐洲比較刑訴法專家Chrisje Brants教授，以及中國(guó)人民大學(xué)何家弘教授，并于2017 年取得博士學(xué)位?，F(xiàn)為上海段和段律師事務(wù)所合伙人。在我國(guó)四級(jí)法院刑庭均有實(shí)習(xí)調(diào)研經(jīng)歷，對(duì)刑事審判實(shí)務(wù)有較為全面和深入的體會(huì)，長(zhǎng)期從事相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的研究和實(shí)踐。2018年與荷蘭同行一起成立海牙仲裁法庭，致力于在歐洲搭建中文（中國(guó)準(zhǔn)據(jù)法）法律服務(wù)平臺(tái)。2019年加入段和段，負(fù)責(zé)其海牙分所的籌建工作，同時(shí)任烏特勒支大學(xué)法學(xué)院客座研究員，協(xié)調(diào)國(guó)內(nèi)外有關(guān)單位，就打擊跨境網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪以及國(guó)內(nèi)法的域外適用與反制等重點(diǎn)議題展開廣泛和深入的學(xué)術(shù)或?qū)崉?wù)合作。

圖書目錄

目錄

中外術(shù)語(yǔ)比較辨析 ································································001

1.閱卷與開示 ···························································002

2.審問(wèn)制與對(duì)抗制 ······················································003

3.審判與檢察 ···························································004

4.權(quán)利與本分 ···························································007

導(dǎo)論 ···················································································008

1.程序透明性與正當(dāng)性的關(guān)系 ·······································008

2.中國(guó)的情況 ···························································015

3.研究課題 ······························································018

4.方法論 ·································································029

第一編中國(guó)現(xiàn)狀

第1章中國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事司法制度的基本理念 ·······························041

1.1 概述 ································································041

1.2 中國(guó)刑事訴訟的重要原則 ······································043

XX

刑事程序中的透明性與正當(dāng)性：擺脫對(duì)抗制的教條

1.3 刑事訴訟的主要參與方 ·········································049

第2章中國(guó)刑事程序的透明性 ··············································061

2.1 中國(guó)普通刑事案件的程序 ······································065

2.2 普通刑事案件的內(nèi)部透明性 ····································078

第一編小結(jié) ··········································································096

第二編典型的對(duì)抗制體系

第3章 “純正”對(duì)抗制的基本宗旨 ········································103

3.1 通例：普通法傳統(tǒng) ···············································103

3.2 理念層面···························································104

3.3 制度層面···························································107

第4章英格蘭刑事程序的基本宗旨和內(nèi)部透明性 ·······················112

4.1 英格蘭刑事程序的基本宗旨 ·····································113

4.2 英格蘭刑事程序的內(nèi)部透明性 ·································129

4.3 小結(jié) ································································134

第5章蘇格蘭刑事程序的基本宗旨和內(nèi)部透明性 ······················139

5.1 蘇格蘭刑事程序的基本宗旨 ····································140

5.2 蘇格蘭刑事程序的內(nèi)部透明性 ·································145

5.3 小結(jié) ································································149

第6章美國(guó)刑事程序的基本宗旨和內(nèi)部透明性 ·························152

6.1 美國(guó)刑事程序的基本宗旨 ······································153

6.2 美國(guó)刑事程序的內(nèi)部透明性 ····································160

6.3 小結(jié) ································································168

XXI

目錄

第7章對(duì)抗制系統(tǒng)之間的比較 ·············································171

7.1 基本宗旨···························································172

7.2 內(nèi)部透明性 ························································174

7.3 小結(jié) ································································175

第二編小結(jié) ·········································································177

第三編結(jié)論：重新審視

第8章中國(guó)經(jīng)典模式中的正當(dāng)性和公正司法 ···························181

8.1 中國(guó)法律制度的歷史背景 ······································181

8.2 中國(guó)構(gòu)建正當(dāng)性的基本模式 ····································192

8.3 中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)模式的前景 ············································198

第9章最終結(jié)論 ·······························································201

9.1 對(duì)比中國(guó)和對(duì)抗制體系 ·········································202

9.2 未來(lái)可行的解決方案 ············································206

9.3 建議方案的可行性和缺陷 ······································213

附錄一導(dǎo)師點(diǎn)評(píng) ·································································220

附錄二相關(guān)外國(guó)法條索引 ·····················································234

附錄三司法數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì) ···························································240

后記 ················································································244

參考文獻(xiàn) ·············································································252